Malanga v. Township of West Orange
On appeal, the appellate court overturned the decision of the trial court, and found that the record lacked adequate basis for finding that the property was a blighted redevelopment area.
Other Notable Cases & Decisions
Related appellate victories and redevelopment decisions from Carlin, Ward, Ash & Heiart.
Orneta v. City of Plainfield
Carlin, Ward, Ash & Heiart LLC represented adjoining property owners in the challenge to a condemnation redevelopment area. The matter was quickly resolved once a complaint was filed and the City agreed to remove the properties from the condemnation redevelopment area.
Read More
Tax Court Clarifies Instances Where Purchasers of Property May Intervene in Already Pending Real Estate Tax Appeals
CWAH partner, Michael J. Ash, represents SFIII Kinderkamack in this pending appeal. As part of a recently published opinion in SF III Kinderkamack, LLC v. Borough of Oradell, the Tax Court of New Jersey clarified its earlier decision in Mobil Administrative Services Co. v. Mansfield Twp. to hold that a...
Read More
In the matter of Bogota Redevelopment Area
Carlin, Ward, Ash & Heiart, LLC represented the interests of a tennis club when the municipality proposed including a portion of their assembled properties in a condemnation redevelopment area. Our attorneys successfully cross-examined the Borough’s planner resulting in the removal of our clients’ properties from the redevelopment area.
Read More