Staying The Course Of Long Branch's Eminent Domain Seizures

If a stay is not issued by the trial court, a property owner must seek relief from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. The standard for issuing a stay in the Appellate Division is difficult to meet and rarely given. The standard for injunctive relief was established by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Crowe v. DiGioia in 1982.

In order to meet the standards, the applicant must demonstrate: 1. That in the absence of such a stay, the claimant will suffer irreparable injury; 2. The legal right underlying the plaintiff’s claim is settled; 3. A reasonable probability of ultimate success on the merits; and 4. The probability of harm to other persons will not be greater than the harm the claimant will suffer in the absence of such relief… – By William J. Ward, Guest Columnist

Other Related News & Publications

Related coverage and publications from Carlin, Ward, Ash & Heiart.

Developer Agrees To Pay Family In Eminent Domain Case $21M

Jersey Journal, July 19, 2012 · By Terrence McDonald

The city paid the family $1.2 million for the waterfront property. But a jury in 2008 determined the actual fair market value to be $18 million, which with interest has risen to $21 million.

Read Article

Long Branch Homeowners Win Eminent Domain Fight

NJ Biz, September 21, 2009 · By Shankar P.

A group of 13 residential property owners in Long Branch won a six-year court battle to keep their homes from being condemned by the city administration, reaching a settlement with the city.

Read Article

New Cases On Top Court's Docket Test Privilege, Deposition Boundaries

New Jersey Law Journal, August 31, 2009 · By Henry Gottlieb

Iron Mountain Information Management v. Newark raises this question: when property is taken under the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, is a commercial tenant with an option to purchase entitled to the same notice as the property owner?

Read Article